← C1

Advanced patterns with reporting verbs

You will be able to Report statements, recommendations, denials and warnings using the correct verb pattern.

Explanation

Reporting verbs take different complements. Some are followed by a gerund, some by an infinitive, and others by a that-clause or an object followed by an infinitive.

Examples

Detailed course

Understand the grammar point

Go to practice ↓

Detailed explanation

This lesson focuses on advanced patterns with reporting verbs. The structure helps learners shape emphasis and evidential stance, and it should always be interpreted as part of a complete message rather than as an isolated formula. Before selecting a form, identify the subject, time reference, clause relationship, and the information that receives emphasis.

Formation is central. Reporting verbs may take a that-clause, to-infinitive, object plus to-infinitive, -ing clause, or preposition plus -ing, and each verb selects its own pattern. Build the sentence in stages: identify the grammatical subject, choose the auxiliary or main verb form, and complete the clause in normal English word order. In negatives and questions, check whether the structure supplies its own auxiliary or requires another one.

The pattern can help users organise complex argument, control information density, and avoid ambiguity in formal writing. These purposes may overlap, so context decides which interpretation is natural. Time expressions, determiners, linking words, and punctuation often provide evidence for the correct choice.

A useful contrast prevents overgeneralisation. Choosing a reporting verb also expresses an evidential or evaluative stance, so claim, acknowledge, allege, concede, and demonstrate are not interchangeable. Ask how the nearest alternative would change time, certainty, focus, politeness, or register. A grammatically possible sentence may still communicate the wrong relationship if that contrast is ignored.

The guided examples are complete messages. Notice how the target structure agrees with its subject and how the surrounding vocabulary makes the intended meaning clear. When producing a new example, preserve the relationship between form and meaning while changing the people, place, and lexical details.

A reliable self-check is to paraphrase the sentence in simpler language. If the paraphrase changes the time relationship, degree of certainty, or focus, review the original form. Compare the sentence with the common mistakes and explain why the corrected version is preferable.

In connected speech and writing, the structure also contributes to cohesion. It guides the reader through background information, main events, causes, qualifications, and results. Clause order and connector choice can therefore affect interpretation even when every individual word is correct.

Register matters as well. A complex construction may be appropriate in a report but unnecessarily heavy in conversation, while an informal alternative may be too vague for academic writing. Choose the form because it serves the communicative purpose, not because it merely sounds advanced.

At an advanced level, apparent exceptions often reflect viewpoint and discourse organisation rather than a broken rule. Writers can manipulate ordering, modality, reference, or clause type to signal distance, caution, contrast, and evaluation. The safest analysis starts with the semantic relationship and then checks whether the syntax expresses it without ambiguity.

During editing, identify every pronoun and implied subject, verify the scope of negatives and modifiers, and check that parallel elements have the same grammatical function. If a shorter construction communicates the same nuance more clearly, prefer the clearer option. Advanced control requires attention to scope, information structure, register, and evidential strength.

How to form it

Reporting verbs may take a that-clause, to-infinitive, object plus to-infinitive, -ing clause, or preposition plus -ing, and each verb selects its own pattern.

Use the structure to shape emphasis and evidential stance.

Use the structure to organise complex argument.

Use the structure to control information density.

Use the structure to avoid ambiguity in formal writing.

Choosing a reporting verb also expresses an evidential or evaluative stance, so claim, acknowledge, allege, concede, and demonstrate are not interchangeable.

Guided examples

The authors argue that the current model overlooks regional variation.

Argue is followed by a that-clause to report a claim.

The report recommends introducing a gradual review process.

Recommend is followed by an -ing form, introducing, not a to-infinitive.

Several witnesses denied having seen the document before the meeting.

Deny is followed by having plus the past participle, showing the denial refers to an earlier action.

The chair reminded members to declare any conflicts of interest.

Remind is followed by an object, members, plus a to-infinitive, to declare.

The researchers acknowledged that their sample was relatively small.

Acknowledge is followed by a that-clause, admitting a limitation.

The minister was accused of withholding relevant information.

Accuse is followed by of plus an -ing form, withholding, in this passive structure.

Common mistakes

Not: The authors argue that the current model overlook regional variation.

Use: The authors argue that the current model overlooks regional variation.

Model is singular, so the verb in the that-clause needs -s: overlooks, not overlook.

Not: The report recommends to introduce a gradual review process.

Use: The report recommends introducing a gradual review process.

Recommend is followed by an -ing form, introducing, not a to-infinitive.

Not: Several witnesses denied to have seen the document before the meeting.

Use: Several witnesses denied having seen the document before the meeting.

Deny is followed by an -ing form, having seen, not a to-infinitive.

Not: The chair reminded members declaring any conflicts of interest.

Use: The chair reminded members to declare any conflicts of interest.

Remind someone to do something uses an object plus to-infinitive: reminded members to declare, not the -ing form.

Before you practise

  • Identify the communicative purpose.
  • Check the subject and required verb or auxiliary.
  • Confirm the time reference and clause order.
  • Compare the sentence with the nearest alternative.
  • Read the complete sentence and verify the meaning.

Reading text

How Sources Frame the Debate

About 521 words

Khan, Morales, council researchers, and a review writer met at a housing-policy research desk to summarise sources about rent and transport costs. The issue could not be reduced to a single mistake, because the sources disagree about causes and evidence. On the table lay vacancy figures, tenant interviews, and council reports, each item carrying a slightly different version of events. Khan argues that rent controls protect vulnerable tenants. That opening point unsettled the earlier account and made the discussion more careful. The council report acknowledges that supply remains limited. The group then separated confirmed facts from interpretations, a distinction that became important as the evidence widened. Morales challenges the reliability of the vacancy figures. Nobody wanted a dramatic conclusion; they wanted a conclusion that could survive another reading of the documents. Several researchers suggest that transport costs should be included. The discussion moved through practical details, public consequences, and the language of the final record. Several people resisted the easiest explanation, since it ignored how decisions made earlier still shaped the present problem. When the meeting ended, the result was clear: the review presents each source with a clear stance. Khan, Morales, council researchers, and a review writer return to vacancy figures, tenant interviews, and council reports because each item helps with the task. The notes show why the sources disagree about causes and evidence. The group checks the time, the place, and the next decision before moving on. No one rushes, because a small error would change the outcome. The work stays connected to a housing-policy research desk, where the problem first became visible. By the end, the result is clear: the review presents each source with a clear stance. Later, the written record helps the group explain the decision without adding new claims. The strongest clue comes from the materials, not from anyone's memory alone. Several details point in different directions, so the group keeps the conclusion careful. The final record can be checked again if the question returns. Khan, Morales, council researchers, and a review writer return to vacancy figures, tenant interviews, and council reports because each item helps with the task. The notes show why the sources disagree about causes and evidence. The group checks the time, the place, and the next decision before moving on. No one rushes, because a small error would change the outcome. The work stays connected to a housing-policy research desk, where the problem first became visible. By the end, the result is clear: the review presents each source with a clear stance. Later, the written record helps the group explain the decision without adding new claims. The strongest clue comes from the materials, not from anyone's memory alone. Several details point in different directions, so the group keeps the conclusion careful. The final record can be checked again if the question returns. Khan, Morales, council researchers, and a review writer return to vacancy figures, tenant interviews, and council reports because each item helps with the task. The notes show why the sources disagree about causes and evidence. The group checks the time, the place, and the next decision before moving on.

Reading comprehension

  1. Who is involved in the reading?

    Show answer

    Khan, Morales, council researchers, and a review writer

  2. Where does the reading take place?

    Show answer

    a housing-policy research desk

  3. What task are the people trying to complete?

    Show answer

    summarise sources about rent and transport costs

  4. What problem makes the task less simple?

    Show answer

    the sources disagree about causes and evidence

  5. How does the reading end?

    Show answer

    the review presents each source with a clear stance

Grammar in the text

  1. Khan argues that rent controls protect vulnerable tenants.

    Argues is followed by a that-clause to report Khan's claim.

  2. The council report acknowledges that supply remains limited.

    Acknowledges is followed by a that-clause, admitting a limitation.

  3. Morales challenges the reliability of the vacancy figures.

    Challenges is followed directly by a noun phrase, the reliability, not a clause.

  4. Several researchers suggest that transport costs should be included.

    Suggest is followed by a that-clause proposing an idea.

Key point

Use this pattern when the meaning needs it in the reading: argue, acknowledge, challenge, suggest + clause/noun. In short, reporting verbs show how sources present claims and evidence. Example: "Khan argues that rent controls protect vulnerable tenants."

Practice

  1. Complete the sentence from the same situation: "Khan argues ____ rent controls protect vulnerable tenants."

    Show answer

    Khan argues that rent controls protect vulnerable tenants.

  2. Complete the sentence from the same situation: "The council report acknowledges ____ supply remains limited."

    Show answer

    The council report acknowledges that supply remains limited.

  3. Complete the sentence from the same situation: "Morales challenges ____ reliability of the vacancy figures."

    Show answer

    Morales challenges the reliability of the vacancy figures.

  4. Complete the sentence from the same situation: "Several researchers suggest ____ transport costs should be included."

    Show answer

    Several researchers suggest that transport costs should be included.

Listening practice

Watch a TEDx talk

“10 ways to have a better conversation” — Celeste Headlee (TED). Listen for clear, natural English and pick up new vocabulary while you review this grammar point.

Check your understanding

Which of these is one of Celeste Headlee's rules for a better conversation?

Check your understanding

What does Headlee say is the single most important skill for having a good conversation?

Practice

Choose the correct answer. She denied ___ the confidential document.

Practice

Choose the correct answer. The adviser recommended that the team ___ the proposal.

Practice

Choose the correct answer. He warned us ___ the risks.

Written practice

Produce the answer yourself. Capitalisation and final punctuation do not affect validation, but the grammar and word order must be correct.

Sentence correction

Written practice

Correct the sentence.

She denied to disclose the information.